STONfi vs DeDust — where is it more profitable to provide liquidity🤔?

Today I asked myself that question, and the answer isn’t as simple as you might think👇.

For example, in the TON/USDT pool, STONfi offers 14% APR, while DeDust offers 9% APR. But in the NOT/TON pool, STONfi has 8.2% APR and DeDust has 10% APR.

It might seem like you should just provide liquidity on STONfi in the first pool and on DeDust in the second🥱.

But in reality, even in the second pool it’s better to use STONfi🧐. Because when evaluating a pool’s profitability, you need to consider not just the APR, but also the total liquidity in the pool💸. In the case of NOT/TON, STONfi holds $900k while DeDust holds $90k .

That means STONfi generates much more in fees📊, and the APR is far more stable compared to DeDust — which is very important if you are providing liquidity long-term📈.

MORE0.75%
Last edited on 2025-08-04 15:03:09
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)